The judicialization of the medical act.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Since its beginning and, more effectively, since the Middle Ages, medical practice has been the subject of relentless social control and, consequently, of the Law itself. In this sense, Medieval Medicine was subjected to the practical analysis of obtained results, whether with the use of medications or surgical interventions, thus defining what therapeutic success, accidental result, unforeseeable circumstances or inexorable course of the disease were.1 From the XIX century on, there was an increase in atrisk surgical procedures and, simultaneously, there was an increase in patients’ complaints and their resistance to submit to the procedures indicated by physicians.2 It was observed that such events occurred precisely at a time of increasing investment in more effective surgical techniques and strategies that culminated in the decrease of hospital infection rates. In the early XX century, due to the growth in legal complaints due to medical malpractice, there was ample discussion on the fact that the bad results that occurred should not be attributed exclusively to the surgeon or clinician who directly worked on the case. It is questioned, then, that the responsibility should be shared by other professionals who had the opportunity to act on or influence the assumed behaviors. At the end of the XX century, medical malpractice became a public health problem, as the human and material resources used for the purpose of correction of ‘‘malpractice’’ increased considerably, amounting to approximately 100,000 cases/year in the United States.3 James Reason, a researcher at the University of Manchester, has discussed ‘‘medical malpractice’’ in several publications, and mainly recommencing the discussion that this malpractice could be systemic and organizational,4 intensifying the concern for a safer medical practice. In Brazil, with the advent of the Consumer Protection Code and the considerable increase in demands for
منابع مشابه
[The judicialization of health in the Federal District of Brazil].
This paper seeks to analyze the Judiciary's approach with respect to demands for the judicialization of the right to health by means of a case study of civil lawsuits for access to health care in Brazil's Federal District. Judicialization of the right to health signifies the judicialization of various of the health services provided. This is a descriptive and exploratory case study that covers ...
متن کامل[The thesis of judicialization of health care by the elites: medication for mucopolysaccharidosis].
This paper evaluates the hypothesis that the judicialization of medicine for mucopolysaccharidosis in Brazil is an action promoted by economic elites. Previous studies upholding the thesis of judicialization by elites in the case of other types of medication that are more costly for the Unified Health Service are discussed. An analysis of all 196 processes containing information about judicial ...
متن کاملThe Judicialization of Health and the Quest for State Accountability: Evidence from 1,262 Lawsuits for Access to Medicines in Southern Brazil
The impact of increasing numbers of lawsuits for access to medicines in Brazil is hotly debated. Government officials and scholars assert that the "judicialization of health" is driven by urban elites and private interests, and is used primarily to access high-cost drugs. Using a systematic sample of 1,262 lawsuits for access to medicines filed against the southern Brazilian state of Rio Grande...
متن کاملMoving the Debate Forward in Right to Health Litigation
The debate on the judicialization of social and economic rights in general, and the right to health in particular, has been beset by polarization between proand anti-judicialization supporters and lack of empirical data to allow an impartial analysis of the consequences of that growing phenomenon. The type of empirical study carried out by Biehl, Socal, and Amon, entitled “The judicialization o...
متن کاملAccess the Unified Health System actions and services from the perspective of judicialization1
OBJECTIVE the judicialization of health is incorporated into the daily work of health institutions in Brazil through the court orders for access. In this study, the objective was to describe the contents of the social representations of access, through judicialization, for the health professionals. METHOD qualitative study based on Social Representations Theory, involving 40 professionals, at...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology
دوره 82 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016